WHY these strange instruction sets NOT ONLY started sometime in IT era, but LASTS... and REAL SHIT-„efficient” task??
Processor evolution, „a new” SSE instructions – ALL THIS IS SHIT. For stupid full-time gamers, maybe – not wanting a real soul change. In other words, it doesn't depend on increasing computer power – it depends on philosophy you have in mind EQV. «=» soul. Computer industry is destined for crappy people – stupid thinks that multiprocessing, speed, CPU overclocking „will bring you more happy”.
No, new motherboard can't make human happy.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE DUE TO EXTREME IMPORTANT IS WHAT YOU DO, NOT HOW ITEMS ARE AROUND YOU. „What” contains „how” and WITH WHICH MORALITY „version” — you mere stupid IDIOTS addicted to games.
Babel, and all shit around it – is a code. In history, at some history line point – we had a good one.
Spoken language is a code. You have a multi-threading in it (w/o IT you shit can't believe).
„Gamers” are not EVEN inside my PC-installed grammar correction dictionary!!
I suddenly realized that ...... maybe US future direction of computer science is more relevant/oriented with BRICS??? Parts re-usability, European Union standards... . It would be fine, then... but where at US' pages are relevant info? They talks rather about conspiracy theories, than possibilities.
Industry' silence.
If it would be a shame to convey proper analysis?? Is it another 0.5/0.5 partial/halfy process, as multitude of Linux&Window$ bugs?? What triggers global IT industries change in USA? I believe in (some?) step into Asian culture of computing — yea, they program Linux, apps, Window$$...
Main implication is a soul implication. Virtual reality (VR) can bring some soul SPEED, but it is difficult to direct soul to good by only-computerized means.
Yea — IT can't guarantee scientific revolution. But, when laid in pair with a philosophy–soul system –» it DOES CAN improve so-called „humanistic” skills. Computers can fact-check both the language (see above) and a scientific theory sets. Computers act in logic manner. Thus, PCs can show you, indirectly or even (more) directly – what logical fallacies you commit.
Caused you cannot program «quad cores» illogically.
Even at „envs” (I don't like this word) of data centers, the computer behave in logical, „unhumanistic” way. Many problems in IT does resemble real-life problems. Experienced programmer sees code quality impact – in various, BUT STILL SCIENTIFIC, structs.
No comments:
Post a Comment