NC - SC

NC - SC

◇◇◇◇◇ REMARK – THIS IS NOT MY MAIN BLOG ◇◇◇◇◇◇

The Better Blog Version is ON WORDPRESS *****To jest blog pomocniczy. Podstawowy jest tu (link trzeba przekopiować): **** https://tradycyjnyyahwista.wordpress.com/ STRUKTURA STRONY:•Wordpress blog zasadniczy, NOWOŚĆ: INDEKS A...Z. Bogate menu, galerie, *AKTUALIZACJE*, ŹRÓDŁA! •Blogger to blog pomocniczy – notatki, też komentarz itp. •YT – playlisty (aż z kilkanaście, PL i ENG.), WYCINKI - FRAGMENTY •Rumble – filmiki, filmy i WYCINKI, Dżek •JustPaste – pozostałe materiały i notatki, koment.

Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Heavens. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Heavens. Show all posts

Sunday, February 19, 2023

Beautiful 2.79 and crap 2.80|INTERNAL vs CyclesPrg-s. broke cloud render...


Sorry if too much conspiracy theory.

•They destroyed it to some crappy China philosophies •Words „Clear” and „Color” have short „Kabbalistic” „mutual” distance. I don't like to be more „scientific” than there is need. Blender, EVEN WHEN OPEN SOURCE & FREEWARE / royality free – are example of more „popular” relations. In such differences, they are deceiving you (constantly).| Ah... maybe level in some cloud generator, •Cycles is slower despite visible change... in even even higher 3x •Common factors of approaches: Spots are 2 – one is blue because I experienced this is OK, second is RED – as naturally normal cloud highlight… •Cloud Gen Python plugin used, in B. •options panel? Colors of Cycles are undelicate, «BIASED» DESPITE THE DISPERSION NOT „APPLICABLE” ! HERE, I hesitate strongly if anything outside context of Internal can change this – cloud coloring by spot's rays (Common factors across approaches: 2 scene lights emitters – one're blue because I experienced this is OK – some particular & erratically made color result error happens when I tried changing in on the nodes ... In summary, I experienced HIGH INCONSISTENCIES OF CYCLES OR maybe EVEN .... LUX... in the so-called new series Cycles „solutions” are very bad. To me, it is made deliberately. They simply want NOT you to be more as animals, as method of boiling the frog – slowly, in disorder to you not having any orientation. Or you want it – something „Eevee/Cycles are so fast, w/ instant previews, some incompleteness can happen... is must be fast, it is not meant to render it... «blah» If you need truly unbiased rendering, try LuxCore or Cycles”. Even if monkeys can (I saw @net vid) drive a car (properly), losing good old tradition pros – is always bad & simply, evil. Surface material in „newer” 2.80 (additional note here: what is time... I explained philosophical matters on another video but currently in Polish-only) .... is Transparent BSDF. So, it would not matter if is is Transparent...? •It seems there is need to program Blender personally. Even Lux can use „LEGACY //WTF” clouds in 2.80. But you cannot use it in the same „FREE” software packet with „New” Eevee/CYCLES. •Cycles is selective, color-biased in whatever Blender line. Don't trust freeware too much. TAGS #WTF #Blender #Internals #Internal #renderer #old #legacy #lights #cloudscape #scenery #heavens #sky #volumetric #procedural #clouds #generator #difference #ranking #line #series #clouddensity #BSDF #interchange #pros #cons #comparison #compatibility #issue #uncompatible #emitter #WTF #palette #effects #highlight #underlight #tricks #previous #releases #cumulus #newer #anew #upgrade #removal #versioning #texture #directions #engines #tips #guidelines #biased #coloring #difference #review #analysis #experiences #pointdensity

Thursday, July 28, 2022

Color variation in clouded evening÷morning sky –non-Rayleigh chrominance palette»Concave Universe

From the same ONE photo, —— NOT from photo series!!
1
2
3 


This is constant pattern, cannot be IMO from chemtrails.
One of materials useful in meditation. Science joins with spirituality.

An Skycentrism examination toolkit!
        In the general model of Skycentrism, light from sun ends its path in UPWARDS direction, colorfully highlighting daytimeborder clouds as on my & external pictures in this video. Inversion of physical laws don't disturb „general” physics (simple daily mechanics etc.). But ... Rayleigh scatter IS STATISTICALONLY „LAW”, not applies at evenings & mornings – if weather of sky is ÷between÷ clear and clouded states (but not with bursts, of course etc. – photo would not depict idea otherwise – YOU MUST BE WISE!!!).
      The system uses statistics to cut details & make propaganda. But I write about things that are described also by Szczytyński on his large, aggregate „redoctobermsz” blog (turn on translator). I you have questions about Concave Earth basics, I recommend his blog as beginner's material.
More information are also on my linked pages.
      Concave reality is Biblical – »»»»»FAITH HAEMUNAH: JHWH rides on/in clouds, as Psalms states clearly. If you do not understand, do not fear to study & THINK, RETHINK sciences in synthesis, and The Main cultural axiom is in Hebrew YAHchanan's the St. John apostle Apocalypse 4:6 & Ap 15:2 verses (Passuks) – BA+ARETZ = we live IN the Earth (=we are englobed). Earth does is Universe. Stationary but dynamic. Sphere, not „ball” – NOTBAAL CULT. We are children of God. Heaven is NOTFARaway.
IN PLAYLISTS: 1ENG & 1PL  ,
LINKSET------------------------------
•link to some external site used https://www.pexels.com/@konevi       
#skycentrism #lightpath #sunlight #scenery #photo #concaveearth #cloudsinthesky #mystery #colortheory #palette #heavenssecret