FireDragon far exceeds BOTH Waterfox and Firefox BY STABILITY÷÷&÷÷quickness („UNCRASHY” element in #Linux), and in the s2disk process better RAM impact.

Maybe not full „Lindows”... still (BUT – I found out now that Qt and Xlib mixing is NOT possible.)

Extracting AppImage was OK, no icu ver. lib errs, nor other libraries problems.

Fast browser FireDragon consolidated with #R language – maybe this has been revolutionary step. And WORKS under Xorg.

I still hate Wayland „smartphonization” of API (irony – when this API is REALLY shit). When you can't port it simply, code a 0.5-code... WHAT THIS USA IS, & WAS?? But browser is OK.

Beautiful 2.79 and crap 2.80|INTERNAL vs CyclesPrg-s. broke cloud render...

Sorry if too much conspiracy theory.

•They destroyed it to some crappy China philosophies •Words „Clear” and „Color” have short „Kabbalistic” „mutual” distance. I don't like to be more „scientific” than there is need. Blender, EVEN WHEN OPEN SOURCE & FREEWARE / royality free – are example of more „popular” relations. In such differences, they are deceiving you (constantly).| Ah... maybe level in some cloud generator, •Cycles is slower despite visible change... in even even higher 3x •Common factors of approaches: Spots are 2 – one is blue because I experienced this is OK, second is RED – as naturally normal cloud highlight… •Cloud Gen Python plugin used, in B. •options panel? Colors of Cycles are undelicate, «BIASED» DESPITE THE DISPERSION NOT „APPLICABLE” ! HERE, I hesitate strongly if anything outside context of Internal can change this – cloud coloring by spot's rays (Common factors across approaches: 2 scene lights emitters – one're blue because I experienced this is OK – some particular & erratically made color result error happens when I tried changing in on the nodes ... In summary, I experienced HIGH INCONSISTENCIES OF CYCLES OR maybe EVEN .... LUX... in the so-called new series Cycles „solutions” are very bad. To me, it is made deliberately. They simply want NOT you to be more as animals, as method of boiling the frog – slowly, in disorder to you not having any orientation. Or you want it – something „Eevee/Cycles are so fast, w/ instant previews, some incompleteness can happen... is must be fast, it is not meant to render it... «blah» If you need truly unbiased rendering, try LuxCore or Cycles”. Even if monkeys can (I saw @net vid) drive a car (properly), losing good old tradition pros – is always bad & simply, evil. Surface material in „newer” 2.80 (additional note here: what is time... I explained philosophical matters on another video but currently in Polish-only) .... is Transparent BSDF. So, it would not matter if is is Transparent...? •It seems there is need to program Blender personally. Even Lux can use „LEGACY //WTF” clouds in 2.80. But you cannot use it in the same „FREE” software packet with „New” Eevee/CYCLES. •Cycles is selective, color-biased in whatever Blender line. Don't trust freeware too much. TAGS #WTF #Blender #Internals #Internal #renderer #old #legacy #lights #cloudscape #scenery #heavens #sky #volumetric #procedural #clouds #generator #difference #ranking #line #series #clouddensity #BSDF #interchange #pros #cons #comparison #compatibility #issue #uncompatible #emitter #WTF #palette #effects #highlight #underlight #tricks #previous #releases #cumulus #newer #anew #upgrade #removal #versioning #texture #directions #engines #tips #guidelines #biased #coloring #difference #review #analysis #experiences #pointdensity