An another example of CE under-cloud-wall light phenomenon | Concave earth

 

Ap 4:6; Ap 15:2; Ap 10:6; Ap 13:12; Ps 102:26; Ps 104:5; Ps 24:1; Ps 47:9; Hi 9:6; Hi 9:8; Hi 26:11; Hi 18:18; Hi 26:7; Hi 26:9; Hi 26:10; Hi 36:29-30; Hi 37:17; Mt 8:12

Ap 4:6; Ap 15:2; Ap 10:6; Ap 13:12; Ps 102:26; Ps 104:5; Ps 24:1; Ps 47:9; Hi 9:6; Hi 9:8; Hi 26:11; Hi 18:18; Hi 26:7; Hi 26:9; Hi 26:10; Hi 36:29-30; Hi 37:17; Mt 8:12

Evening cloud are symmetrically similar to morning ones. Both are implied from a cloud wall mechanism. I explained it more on my Python script, see my blogs. Series of my photo in the ***4Concavity**** series. In this type of „dramatic skies” the most dramatic remains that masses still beLIEve in Copernic's «rotating» ball and big bang universe / = G-d Faraway „approach” system - I tested even IOR layers, added even the cosmic (— rather .... COMIC?!) vacuum emptiness tochu wa wochu etc. – in Blender, and what about laws of mechanics, friction (see sims!), sky „Parhelias”  ? I've FAITH: God is NEAR, NOT IN THE VERY DEEP COSMOS!! You can't even do proper simulation of Parhelias cause it is all SPIRITUAL–LINKED! 

*Ap 4:6; Ap 15:2; Ap 10:6; Ap 13:12; Ps 102:26; Ps 104:5; Ps 24:1; Ps 47:9; Hi 9:6; Hi 9:8; Hi 26:11; Hi 18:18; Hi 26:7; Hi 26:9; Hi 26:10; Hi 36:29-30; Hi 37:17; Mt 8:12*

#heavens #skies #album #shots #photocollection #photos #scenery #relaxing #concaveearth #refraction_of_light #skylights #sunlight #beautiful #photography #nature #clouds #highlights #gradient #vlog #dramaticsky 

#bending #physics #concavity 

Why u can’t do mini-scaled Rayleigh model of scattering from refrigerato...

They lie that waste partices, smoke...., even ha ha ha sand.... they search to program you to think this light scattering is „maybe” sand from foreign air masses... . Kitchen ice from fridge as physics minimodel – as reductio «ad absurdum» reasoning minimodel of so-called Rayleigh scattering equation system. The simulation picture joined with EXTERNAL material, http://pymud.net/proj/space/sample.html (WebGL required, new ver of Firefox esp.) HAVEN'T CLOUDS – that is LACK OF FACTOR/COFACTOR – BASED OF ACADEMIC, POPULISTIC, EVEN JESUIT.... LIE. Generally atmospheric refraction form is bluff. Complicated equations tend to make fear, NOT to clear things – EVEN ! IN ERA OF SUPERCOMPUTERS, MAINFRAME ADV. MACHINES. This and that (flat earth) theories are made in order to to try to throw God. Light bending also was „created” in the same black, evil (as holes are black... it is NOT accident I think... this puzzle joins mutually in 1 thing!). Details on material. –––SET OF LINKS, TO START YOUR OWN RESEARCH:––––– •https://emtoolbox.nist.gov/Wavelength/Documentation.asp •https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refractive_index •4begginers: LSC Concave Earth channel •Rayleigh „simulation” is from http://pymud.net/proj/space/sample.html •Ciddor air IOR range: •https://emtoolbox.nist.gov/Wavelength/Documentation.asp •https://godotforums.org/d/23480-dynamic-rayleigh-mie-sky-with-volumetric-clouds-sky-shader •https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rayleigh_scattering •https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dipole#Dipole_radiation • https://emtoolbox.nist.gov/Wavelength/Documentation.asp •https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refractive_index TAGS #rayleigh #refrigerator #rayleigh #air #physics #concaveearth #cellearth #colorful #refraction #dispersion #sunlight #mechanism #difficult #gradient #ice #science #discovery #truth #faith #deception #conspiracy #optics #rendering #earth #equation #preface #academic #debunked #particles #molecules #h2o #o2 #oxygen #air #phenomenon #vapor #atmosphere