Sometimes it is better to COPY the Linux kernel (&includes) from a Live distro - effect: ZERO dmesg's about sr0 drive!

• Knoppix Linux distribution is good example. Compilation (Kbuild) is often (or very often?) waste of time - this, that switch – with SATA / PATA driver, .config-file IMO strange combinations — is time-waster. Linux should bring normality, NOT Windows-typed bugs (which one is hibernation spinning down HDD three times). [But actual Linux versions have THIS hiber-bug still – Torvalds IMO seems not concerned about it if this bug is... BY DESIGN. „Design = resign”.]. One problem [CD] you can resolve but other is, as far as I study code – algorithmic one. Knoppix launches even from GRUB (the ISO file placed somewhere...) and this technique should be recommended when dealing with new hardware (avoiding unnecessary compilations if they produce so many hardware - year after year....). Some DVD drive not lasted even about several months.
• Includes' have symlink – pointing to kernel includes (so important, without need to seach for ....-headers package)
• Kernel, now 5.10.10-64 seems a bit faster sometimes
• ZERO dmesg's about sr0 drive! No horkages, no CD driver speed limit

Hibernation 3 spindowns@full cycle—THE FIXING process: they seems to CONFUSE standby w/sleep and/or... w/hibernation — inside libata-core.c

What is this function?? When it is not from group of standard PM callbacks.

Mistake fallacy between HDD spin down programs and... hibernation?? Windows Revo Sleep app in subconscious!!!! Bugs origin from bad religion in hearts, not (generatively) from spoken (not so much in media...) laziness (it is a derivative-only — see they can't use categorial logic when programming!!:::) — they psycho-compensate it with „means” of prolonged categorial bias fallacies, when using too-scattered procedures of different name elements. What is role of ata_dev_power_standby function?? Fully manual standby of DISK-ONLY (as one of functions of old Win' Revo Sleep for example), -or- SYSTEM-WIDE??

Original libata-core.c code nano's (additionally, HTML is gnome-term... not from quick roxterm app!!!!) view - see how many „Torvaldic” logical fallacies we have inside (ver 6.11.0-....-MANJARO)

Maybe „...ion” GOGical name??? There was a time I thought America is smarter. It is not mere difference such as for ex. DMA-UDMA difference. It is logical fallacy across multiple, scattered Linux PM code (and, if using inductive reasoning in humanistic disciplines, other contemporary Linux functionalities!!!!)

1999 void ata_dev_power_set_standby(struct ata_device *dev)
2000 {
2001         unsigned long ap_flags = dev->link->ap->flags;
2002         struct ata_taskfile tf;
2003         unsigned int err_mask;
2004
2005         /* If the device is already sleeping or in standby, do nothing. */
2006         if ((dev->flags & ATA_DFLAG_SLEEPING) ||
2007             !ata_dev_power_is_active(dev))
2008                 return;
2009
2010         /*
2011          * Some odd clown BIOSes issue spindown on power off (ACPI S4 or S>
2012          * causing some drives to spin up and down again. For these, do no>
2013          * if we are being called on shutdown.
2014          */
2015         if ((ap_flags & ATA_FLAG_NO_POWEROFF_SPINDOWN) &&
2016             system_state == SYSTEM_POWER_OFF)
2017                 return;
2018
2019         if ((ap_flags & ATA_FLAG_NO_HIBERNATE_SPINDOWN) &&
2020             system_entering_hibernation())
2021                 return;

Encyclopedia approach DOES MATTER. Design patterns of function naming. Name it longerly.

What ...do_suspend differs than ...set_standby??? Even from ancient point of view, the „set” and the „do” words are very different — „do” is more „Javanic” (Greek). Remember Java Script? You program some stuff (or, worserly, someones - NLP...) but the function nesting overhead appears.

     —Instead of concentrate of mere irrelevant „problems” typed oh! you are using Manjaro Linux, you should learn first that words matters. Structure of word has internal logic — NOT ONLY RBX-categories or RSI – that word you use, THAT level of wisdom you will have. As in religion, as in programming (see Strong's Concordance to meditate more (not Rome!!!) on role of individual letters in the building of word AND BE HUMBLE, USTUPID).

Bad bug of hibernation causes 3 HDD spindowns in a full s2disk cycle -SUDDENLY I found THIS[after I reduced it to 2]

Possible solution for hibernation problem

But why it is not in /proc/... filesystem already??

Documentation abilities of Linuxed USA is still very poor – it frustrates so much. I remember Microsoft MSDN, it was written in good manner, easy to read, find, etc. . But in Linux, some Qt help program does is – but seems to be still in early stage. The sh**it of problem is having to remember next, next – why Windows had XP with good hibernation feature and Linux to this days, on the same BIOS (!!!) spins down HDD three times?

Maybe not BIOS is bad, but OS(es) itself.

Windows XP hiber-OK => Windows 7 regression (with the same BIOS, understand!!!). And now some strange module lines to #define some boolean value?? Hopefully, someone can think libata has 150k of lines — rather NOT.

Compilation furtherly – not believing programming groups – why?

Because („caused [to]”...) they, in my theory at least, have fun of old „technique” of making partial product (0.5-working, in other word aka „halfy”) — in disorder to make fun of repairing, repairing... . The worst feature of America, since „multipersons” don't trusting „original” G-d – they manipulate also Bible, even named it after Babel. If they can't read Hebrew „code”, they MUST have weak programming abilities – it is a general correlation of reality. In exegesis, a good code is helpful also. Letter by letter /literally/ in so-called „prehistoric” (!!!) languages „sin” can mean „China”. Atheists have NO good software philosophy, rather an POV of stupidity. If C++ programmer is „baptist”, then (IMO) he doesn't code in bug-resistant manner. 

You have poor religion, you are poor „informatician”. 

Those groups simply can't. Why they not opening BIOS/UEFI source code – an one example of thesis' evidence. 

...ATA flags?? You made source code (almost?) unreadable by „horkages”, „DMAs” and _do_ 's!!

Why not one „uncloned” procedure, but this nested ...do.... PM's function names and stuff?? Effect of years of laziness, addiction to music (why monopoly of Apple, can't do fusion with portable hardware producers?? You like your shit Babel crap, when stupid immoral can make money almost from nothing (aka fiduciary value in „eco”nomy). Some of this „rule” we see in „real life” of game industry (the most), and fears of incompatibility of Rockbox MP3 player „BIOS”.

Testing /lib/modules-load.d/cdrecord.conf interference (of cdrecord package)

Still bugs – this ZEROS want to „create” new forums to boast it. They simply need new bugs in disorder to announce that they make „progress” and work. An paper SHIT of work... . This Linux sado-masochists, as other masses, stay at old BIOS traditions of bug, bugs, bugs. Crappy apes to boast with other liars, and shit cycle of „you can”. Idiots using new SSD, while Linux allways have big amount of small files. CAN YOU UNDERSTAND WHILE I NOT USE „CANDY” WORD „DIFFERENT” STUPID OVERSCIENTIFIC SHIT?

And why „sg” module in other place than udev? You put in in udev, crap... maybe and you stupid talking you made new distro? Aha – you already taked that systemd is „bad”... what in exchange, USA without future?

And you even cannot tell your people at start, that systemd-udevd DOES IS in the initcpio (I found it by using lsinitcpio command). If  y o u   can't explain work of basic system tool, why you open APE-epic mouth at forums (OFTEN W/O EVEN ONE REPLY YOU FALLIING AMERICA). USA is the place of corruption, lie, colonialism, void „oy” „oy” things.