NC - SC

NC - SC

◇◇◇◇◇ REMARK – THIS IS NOT MY MAIN BLOG ◇◇◇◇◇◇

The Better Blog Version is ON WORDPRESS *****To jest blog pomocniczy. Podstawowy jest tu (link trzeba przekopiować): **** https://tradycyjnyyahwista.wordpress.com/ STRUKTURA STRONY:•Wordpress blog zasadniczy, NOWOŚĆ: INDEKS A...Z. Bogate menu, galerie, *AKTUALIZACJE*, ŹRÓDŁA! •Blogger to blog pomocniczy – notatki, też komentarz itp. •YT – playlisty (aż z kilkanaście, PL i ENG.), WYCINKI - FRAGMENTY •Rumble – filmiki, filmy i WYCINKI, Dżek •JustPaste – pozostałe materiały i notatki, koment.

Search This Blog

Showing posts with label rendering. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rendering. Show all posts

Sunday, February 19, 2023

Beautiful 2.79 and crap 2.80|INTERNAL vs CyclesPrg-s. broke cloud render...


Sorry if too much conspiracy theory.

•They destroyed it to some crappy China philosophies •Words „Clear” and „Color” have short „Kabbalistic” „mutual” distance. I don't like to be more „scientific” than there is need. Blender, EVEN WHEN OPEN SOURCE & FREEWARE / royality free – are example of more „popular” relations. In such differences, they are deceiving you (constantly).| Ah... maybe level in some cloud generator, •Cycles is slower despite visible change... in even even higher 3x •Common factors of approaches: Spots are 2 – one is blue because I experienced this is OK, second is RED – as naturally normal cloud highlight… •Cloud Gen Python plugin used, in B. •options panel? Colors of Cycles are undelicate, «BIASED» DESPITE THE DISPERSION NOT „APPLICABLE” ! HERE, I hesitate strongly if anything outside context of Internal can change this – cloud coloring by spot's rays (Common factors across approaches: 2 scene lights emitters – one're blue because I experienced this is OK – some particular & erratically made color result error happens when I tried changing in on the nodes ... In summary, I experienced HIGH INCONSISTENCIES OF CYCLES OR maybe EVEN .... LUX... in the so-called new series Cycles „solutions” are very bad. To me, it is made deliberately. They simply want NOT you to be more as animals, as method of boiling the frog – slowly, in disorder to you not having any orientation. Or you want it – something „Eevee/Cycles are so fast, w/ instant previews, some incompleteness can happen... is must be fast, it is not meant to render it... «blah» If you need truly unbiased rendering, try LuxCore or Cycles”. Even if monkeys can (I saw @net vid) drive a car (properly), losing good old tradition pros – is always bad & simply, evil. Surface material in „newer” 2.80 (additional note here: what is time... I explained philosophical matters on another video but currently in Polish-only) .... is Transparent BSDF. So, it would not matter if is is Transparent...? •It seems there is need to program Blender personally. Even Lux can use „LEGACY //WTF” clouds in 2.80. But you cannot use it in the same „FREE” software packet with „New” Eevee/CYCLES. •Cycles is selective, color-biased in whatever Blender line. Don't trust freeware too much. TAGS #WTF #Blender #Internals #Internal #renderer #old #legacy #lights #cloudscape #scenery #heavens #sky #volumetric #procedural #clouds #generator #difference #ranking #line #series #clouddensity #BSDF #interchange #pros #cons #comparison #compatibility #issue #uncompatible #emitter #WTF #palette #effects #highlight #underlight #tricks #previous #releases #cumulus #newer #anew #upgrade #removal #versioning #texture #directions #engines #tips #guidelines #biased #coloring #difference #review #analysis #experiences #pointdensity

Friday, November 4, 2022

Why u can’t do mini-scaled Rayleigh model of scattering from refrigerato...

They lie that waste partices, smoke...., even ha ha ha sand.... they search to program you to think this light scattering is „maybe” sand from foreign air masses... . Kitchen ice from fridge as physics minimodel – as reductio «ad absurdum» reasoning minimodel of so-called Rayleigh scattering equation system. The simulation picture joined with EXTERNAL material, http://pymud.net/proj/space/sample.html (WebGL required, new ver of Firefox esp.) HAVEN'T CLOUDS – that is LACK OF FACTOR/COFACTOR – BASED OF ACADEMIC, POPULISTIC, EVEN JESUIT.... LIE. Generally atmospheric refraction form is bluff. Complicated equations tend to make fear, NOT to clear things – EVEN ! IN ERA OF SUPERCOMPUTERS, MAINFRAME ADV. MACHINES. This and that (flat earth) theories are made in order to to try to throw God. Light bending also was „created” in the same black, evil (as holes are black... it is NOT accident I think... this puzzle joins mutually in 1 thing!). Details on material. –––SET OF LINKS, TO START YOUR OWN RESEARCH:––––– •https://emtoolbox.nist.gov/Wavelength/Documentation.asp •https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refractive_index •4begginers: LSC Concave Earth channel •Rayleigh „simulation” is from http://pymud.net/proj/space/sample.html •Ciddor air IOR range: •https://emtoolbox.nist.gov/Wavelength/Documentation.asp •https://godotforums.org/d/23480-dynamic-rayleigh-mie-sky-with-volumetric-clouds-sky-shader •https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rayleigh_scattering •https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dipole#Dipole_radiation • https://emtoolbox.nist.gov/Wavelength/Documentation.asp •https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refractive_index TAGS #rayleigh #refrigerator #rayleigh #air #physics #concaveearth #cellearth #colorful #refraction #dispersion #sunlight #mechanism #difficult #gradient #ice #science #discovery #truth #faith #deception #conspiracy #optics #rendering #earth #equation #preface #academic #debunked #particles #molecules #h2o #o2 #oxygen #air #phenomenon #vapor #atmosphere