(For the main blog service, go click a Wordpress version. This is a helper-blog ONLY, not meant to replace the main portal)
 |
| Delicate result pattern is a key to rendering artistic essence of Concave Earth - related phenomenons. Game of colors is beautiful |
Remember about proper Contrast Node VALUE in LuxCore nodetree! The 10 can be OK very often, according to my experience & intuition.
This is one of key differences from viewpoint (and, standpoint) of some flat Earth narratives. They draw something, but omit practical aspects (such as, meditation, lens shape and light path through FIRMAMENT). Basically, Heavens canNOT have any „lens” — firmament is a prism, not the standard lens!! Maybe something called as sailors - knew „effect” photographed somewhere at Concave Hollow Cellular Earth or Rumble (don't remember exactly the channel...), BUT the science behind Great Concavity is based rather on some system of empirical things (zooming of photo lens set for example – the «NONLINEAR» leveler equipment zooming view also). Main experience is definitely meditation, interlinked with science.
Digression: „Sailor's Effect”.
— Variation — description [Polish lang. v. sim. to russian... so far] Around Time location https://youtu.be/ICdojkqEMTo?t=203
And, LuxCore Render is faster, only several hours (even without need of „GPU compute”: OpenCL/CUDA etc. frameworks). Cycles a contrario, wastes several days. OFTEN, and is incompatible & inaccurate generally. Specifically, it HASN'T ANY, ANY dispersion.
°Some tricks in Cycles can't be named optical dispersion effect. The Cycles is bad, simply. I can't recommend even Eevee Next, if to want 100% satisfying Clouds.
°Rendering in „Lux” or Blender Internal is something very different than „comic” – ness (comic style, all this Grease Pencil, etc.)of „mainline”, „pumpatible” Cycles renderer usages, applications.
—If we treat IT as sci-fi, or some hysteric comic book, we remain ATHEISTS.
Role of Concave Earth studies ALWAYS must be that — G-d is ONE, BUT Philosophically Personalistic & specifically Proxime. All narration, not matter which: „humanistic” approach, or „scientific” — go in one direction: Replacing Old Copernican „agnostic” with more ultimate means of rationalization (some real science).
•Thus, computer graphics, generally IT, CAN bring to the goodness. Computers are not as bad as some conspiracy theorists can speak.
•Computers are NOT „geeky”, „such hazardous, unsecure” beast. ONLY (im)morality can turn it into. NOT the computer science in itself. Everything depends on morality of the user. IoT (Internet Of Things) can be dual, as everything else in life. Choose good, not bad. & Keep It Simple.