Google Chrome derivatives: THE MOST „SMARTPHONIZED” (LAGGY, ERRATICAL, CRASHY...) GUI & ENGINES!!!

Even after hardware acceleration disabled & vm.swappiness = 110 [ZRAM still ON]

Code quality is IMO highly to uneffective – why you name this dirs in such strange, „sometimes” unmeaningable f... names???

•Remember freeware society ARE CORPORATIONS, ALSO. As on Dominik Tarczyński's event part —were spoken once: you should interest in society MORE THAN IN POLITICIANS

•Yea, even compared to old Firefox experience (on the same motherboard).

•Firefox clone sometimes also has similar problems. USA == „ARURTUS”.

Compare Donald Trump's host – ...they manipulated also in IT.

Computers programmed by America were in context of satanic Mac, buggy old Windows — and whatever you „dive into”, „explore” – this BIOS'ES (enumerating also: UEFI) & electronics CAN, AND ARE – BUGGY S**T.

Open BIOS'd be OK. Kurt Goedel's theorem above all recursively enumeratables...

Rat race – both small and „money”: See what this crapmans made by your f****** idolatries' „derive**RAT**ives”... .

Code quality is IMO highly to uneffective – why you name this dirs in such strange, „sometimes” unmeaningable f... names???

USA as SHITTY ON SHITS: THE TRUTH of halfy (0.5) functional „community” Linuxes (sr0 errors despite Master/Slave@BIOS&cables) - you are SHIT and SHIT, USA, still not believing corpoRATe-focused conspiracy theories?!!

Reconfigured SATA cables even next time - now „sequence” (how primitive is yours language, USA) is master/slave with one „channel”/SATA sockets „column” (red master and black slave??)— the errors remains,
•DETAILS / „RAT”–ionale
only effect that bigger amount of data is read manually in commanline (this stupid, psychonarcissism-only—oriented „programmers” (what shit!!) don't interested in QUALITY) from CD BEFORE ERROR.Why someone would be interested, in exchanging of systemd with older stuff?? When across Internet not anyone having GOOD experiences with Linux – STILL WHERE ARE YOUR LOGIC, „US”? Can't repair old bugs you BUGGY, mere & demonic people of SHIT? Because only money, pride and other sin? BRICS sometimes (...by TECH and by money even also) is economy IMO more worth time. Why not believe what Alex Jones talks, then? This sadomasochists can't even express (...real/true...) regret for what they messed IT across whole colonized world.

Hibernation 3 spindowns@full cycle—THE FIXING process: they seems to CONFUSE standby w/sleep and/or... w/hibernation — inside libata-core.c

What is this function?? When it is not from group of standard PM callbacks.

Mistake fallacy between HDD spin down programs and... hibernation?? Windows Revo Sleep app in subconscious!!!! Bugs origin from bad religion in hearts, not (generatively) from spoken (not so much in media...) laziness (it is a derivative-only — see they can't use categorial logic when programming!!:::) — they psycho-compensate it with „means” of prolonged categorial bias fallacies, when using too-scattered procedures of different name elements. What is role of ata_dev_power_standby function?? Fully manual standby of DISK-ONLY (as one of functions of old Win' Revo Sleep for example), -or- SYSTEM-WIDE??

Original libata-core.c code nano's (additionally, HTML is gnome-term... not from quick roxterm app!!!!) view - see how many „Torvaldic” logical fallacies we have inside (ver 6.11.0-....-MANJARO)

Maybe „...ion” GOGical name??? There was a time I thought America is smarter. It is not mere difference such as for ex. DMA-UDMA difference. It is logical fallacy across multiple, scattered Linux PM code (and, if using inductive reasoning in humanistic disciplines, other contemporary Linux functionalities!!!!)

1999 void ata_dev_power_set_standby(struct ata_device *dev)
2000 {
2001         unsigned long ap_flags = dev->link->ap->flags;
2002         struct ata_taskfile tf;
2003         unsigned int err_mask;
2004
2005         /* If the device is already sleeping or in standby, do nothing. */
2006         if ((dev->flags & ATA_DFLAG_SLEEPING) ||
2007             !ata_dev_power_is_active(dev))
2008                 return;
2009
2010         /*
2011          * Some odd clown BIOSes issue spindown on power off (ACPI S4 or S>
2012          * causing some drives to spin up and down again. For these, do no>
2013          * if we are being called on shutdown.
2014          */
2015         if ((ap_flags & ATA_FLAG_NO_POWEROFF_SPINDOWN) &&
2016             system_state == SYSTEM_POWER_OFF)
2017                 return;
2018
2019         if ((ap_flags & ATA_FLAG_NO_HIBERNATE_SPINDOWN) &&
2020             system_entering_hibernation())
2021                 return;

Encyclopedia approach DOES MATTER. Design patterns of function naming. Name it longerly.

What ...do_suspend differs than ...set_standby??? Even from ancient point of view, the „set” and the „do” words are very different — „do” is more „Javanic” (Greek). Remember Java Script? You program some stuff (or, worserly, someones - NLP...) but the function nesting overhead appears.

     —Instead of concentrate of mere irrelevant „problems” typed oh! you are using Manjaro Linux, you should learn first that words matters. Structure of word has internal logic — NOT ONLY RBX-categories or RSI – that word you use, THAT level of wisdom you will have. As in religion, as in programming (see Strong's Concordance to meditate more (not Rome!!!) on role of individual letters in the building of word AND BE HUMBLE, USTUPID).

Bad bug of hibernation causes 3 HDD spindowns in a full s2disk cycle -SUDDENLY I found THIS[after I reduced it to 2]

Possible solution for hibernation problem

But why it is not in /proc/... filesystem already??

Documentation abilities of Linuxed USA is still very poor – it frustrates so much. I remember Microsoft MSDN, it was written in good manner, easy to read, find, etc. . But in Linux, some Qt help program does is – but seems to be still in early stage. The sh**it of problem is having to remember next, next – why Windows had XP with good hibernation feature and Linux to this days, on the same BIOS (!!!) spins down HDD three times?

Maybe not BIOS is bad, but OS(es) itself.

Windows XP hiber-OK => Windows 7 regression (with the same BIOS, understand!!!). And now some strange module lines to #define some boolean value?? Hopefully, someone can think libata has 150k of lines — rather NOT.

Compilation furtherly – not believing programming groups – why?

Because („caused [to]”...) they, in my theory at least, have fun of old „technique” of making partial product (0.5-working, in other word aka „halfy”) — in disorder to make fun of repairing, repairing... . The worst feature of America, since „multipersons” don't trusting „original” G-d – they manipulate also Bible, even named it after Babel. If they can't read Hebrew „code”, they MUST have weak programming abilities – it is a general correlation of reality. In exegesis, a good code is helpful also. Letter by letter /literally/ in so-called „prehistoric” (!!!) languages „sin” can mean „China”. Atheists have NO good software philosophy, rather an POV of stupidity. If C++ programmer is „baptist”, then (IMO) he doesn't code in bug-resistant manner. 

You have poor religion, you are poor „informatician”. 

Those groups simply can't. Why they not opening BIOS/UEFI source code – an one example of thesis' evidence. 

...ATA flags?? You made source code (almost?) unreadable by „horkages”, „DMAs” and _do_ 's!!

Why not one „uncloned” procedure, but this nested ...do.... PM's function names and stuff?? Effect of years of laziness, addiction to music (why monopoly of Apple, can't do fusion with portable hardware producers?? You like your shit Babel crap, when stupid immoral can make money almost from nothing (aka fiduciary value in „eco”nomy). Some of this „rule” we see in „real life” of game industry (the most), and fears of incompatibility of Rockbox MP3 player „BIOS”.

Testing /lib/modules-load.d/cdrecord.conf interference (of cdrecord package)

Still bugs – this ZEROS want to „create” new forums to boast it. They simply need new bugs in disorder to announce that they make „progress” and work. An paper SHIT of work... . This Linux sado-masochists, as other masses, stay at old BIOS traditions of bug, bugs, bugs. Crappy apes to boast with other liars, and shit cycle of „you can”. Idiots using new SSD, while Linux allways have big amount of small files. CAN YOU UNDERSTAND WHILE I NOT USE „CANDY” WORD „DIFFERENT” STUPID OVERSCIENTIFIC SHIT?

And why „sg” module in other place than udev? You put in in udev, crap... maybe and you stupid talking you made new distro? Aha – you already taked that systemd is „bad”... what in exchange, USA without future?

And you even cannot tell your people at start, that systemd-udevd DOES IS in the initcpio (I found it by using lsinitcpio command). If  y o u   can't explain work of basic system tool, why you open APE-epic mouth at forums (OFTEN W/O EVEN ONE REPLY YOU FALLIING AMERICA). USA is the place of corruption, lie, colonialism, void „oy” „oy” things.